Pehta Indigenous Impact Report: Bulk Data Upload Pricing

At Pehta, we understand that companies of different sizes have different reporting needs. That’s why we offer simple, flat-fee pricing for businesses looking to bulk upload data and generate a Pehta Indigenous Impact Report—a standardized, credible, and auditable summary of your company’s Indigenous procurement, employment, and community benefits.

Our pricing is designed to be affordable for small businesses while capturing more value from larger enterprises that benefit from Pehta’s reporting in ESG compliance, investor relations, and regulatory filings.

Why Do We Use a Flat-Fee Model?

✅ Fair & Scalable – Pricing is based on company size, ensuring affordability for smaller businesses while aligning costs with value for larger firms.
✅ Unlimited Submissions – One flat fee covers all necessary data uploads for your Indigenous Impact Report—no per-project or per-record charges.
✅ Compliance-Ready – Your report meets industry best practices for ESG, Indigenous benefit compliance, and project transparency, providing confidence to stakeholders.
✅ Efficient & Automated – Our system automates much of the validation process, minimizing manual effort and delivering a seamless reporting experience.

Flat-Fee Pricing by Company Size

To ensure your company can participate in credible Indigenous impact reporting, we use a tiered flat-fee structure based on annual revenue.

Company Size (Annual Revenue)Flat Fee (Per Year)Small Business (Under $1M revenue)$1,000Lower Mid-Market ($1M–$10M revenue)$2,500 – $3,000Upper Mid-Market ($10M–$100M revenue)$5,000 – $10,000Large Enterprise ($100M–$500M revenue)$15,000 – $20,000Major Enterprise ($500M+ revenue)$30,000 – $50,000+

Each tier includes:
✔ Bulk data upload for Indigenous impact reporting
✔ Automated validation and processing
✔ Comprehensive Pehta Indigenous Impact Report (1-page format)
✔ No per-user or per-project charges

For companies well above $1B in revenue or requiring advanced analytics, we offer custom enterprise pricing based on data complexity and reporting needs.

How Does It Work?

📤 Step 1: Upload Your Data – Provide project-level procurement, employment, and benefit data through our secure platform.
🔍 Step 2: Automated Processing & Validation – Our system analyzes your data, applies Pehta’s Indigenous impact framework, and ensures compliance.
📄 Step 3: Receive Your Indigenous Impact Report – Get a credible, SOC 2-compliant report that is statistically valid and ready for stakeholders.

Why Pehta?

Pehta is the only standardized, auditable Indigenous impact reporting solution available today. Unlike ad-hoc corporate reports, Pehta ensures:

✔ Statistical Confidence – We audit at least 27% of your revenue and 25% of your projects to provide a 90% confidence level in reported Indigenous impact.
✔ Compliance Alignment – Our framework supports ESG compliance, regulatory filings, and Indigenous benefit agreements.
✔ Industry Trust – Pehta is built with Indigenous communities in mind, ensuring credibility in project reporting.

Ensuring Statistical Confidence in Pehta Reporting

At Pehta, we ensure that our Indigenous impact data reporting is statistically rigorous, credible, and comparable across industries. A key aspect of this credibility comes from our audit methodology, which determines how much of a company’s revenue and projects must be audited to ensure reliable Indigenous procurement, employment, and community benefit data.

Through statistical analysis, we have established that auditing at least 27% of a company’s total revenue provides 90% confidence that the Indigenous impact proportions observed in the audited portion are representative of the entire company. However, since Indigenous participation can vary significantly across projects, we also require that at least 25% of all projects be included in the audit.

This dual-threshold approach ensures that both high-value projects and a broad range of projects are examined, preventing distortions that could arise if only the largest projects were audited. This methodology guarantees that Pehta-reported Indigenous impact data is:

✅ Credible – Using well-established statistical principles, our methodology aligns with financial auditing and compliance reporting standards.
✅ Comparable – Standardized across industries, allowing fair assessments of Indigenous procurement, employment, and community benefits.
✅ Defensible – Backed by rigorous sampling techniques to withstand scrutiny from stakeholders, auditors, and regulators.

  • Statistical analysis shows that auditing at least 27% of revenue provides 90% confidence in the Indigenous impact proportions across total company revenue. However, because different projects may have varying levels of Indigenous participation, we also require a minimum of 25% of all projects to be audited. This ensures that smaller or less profitable projects are not underrepresented, giving a true reflection of Indigenous participation across all company operations.

  • If only one project is audited, it may not be statistically representative of the company’s entire project portfolio. For example, a company might have many smaller projects where Indigenous participation is significantly different. By also requiring at least 25% of total projects, Pehta ensures a broad and representative sample, preventing bias from single high-revenue projects skewing the results.

  • A 90% confidence level means that if we conducted the audit multiple times, 9 out of 10 times, the true Indigenous impact proportion would be within a 5% margin of error of the reported value. This follows best practices in financial auditing, ESG compliance, and regulatory reporting, balancing precision with practicality.

  • Based on statistical sampling principles, auditing at least 25% of projects (in addition to 27% of revenue) meets the minimum sample size required to achieve 90% confidence in project-wide Indigenous impact proportions. This is aligned with audit methodologies that determine sample size based on variability, confidence levels, and margin of error. For companies with large project portfolios, the absolute number of projects audited will be sufficient to ensure a high level of statistical certainty.

  • If Indigenous participation varies widely across projects, Pehta may require an even higher percentage of projects to be audited to maintain 90% confidence. Additionally, we use stratified sampling, meaning projects are categorized by size, industry type, and region, ensuring the sample captures the full diversity of the company’s operations.

  • A full audit would be ideal but is impractical, costly, and unnecessary. By auditing a statistically determined sample, Pehta achieves the same level of confidence while significantly reducing the administrative burden on companies. This approach is consistent with financial audit standards, ESG assurance, and compliance best practices.

  • A ±5% margin of error means that if Indigenous employment in the audited portion is 12%, then the true company-wide Indigenous employment is likely between 7% and 17%. This range is statistically sound for decision-making while allowing companies to assess their Indigenous impact without needing full revenue audits.

Pehta Reporting: Setting the Standard for Indigenous Impact Data

By auditing at least 27% of total revenue and at least 25% of projects, Pehta ensures that Indigenous procurement, employment, and community benefits are measured with a high level of confidence, aligning with industry best practices for financial audits, ESG reporting, and compliance assessments.

Companies using Pehta reporting can confidently state their Indigenous impact data is credible, verifiable, and statistically sound, giving stakeholders the assurance they need to make informed, responsible business decisions.